PROVIDING CREATIVITY IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT DURING THE EPOCH OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: PHILOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
Keywords:
technology-enhanced learning, creative learning, flipped classrooms, blended learning, personalized, project-based, virtual reality, augmented reality, gamification, AI and machine learning, diversity, inclusion.Abstract
This research explores the relevance and scientific novelty of conceptual features in the design of effective creative learning environments in the sphere of foreign philology. It emphasizes the often-overlooked extended intermediate phase of learning, proposing an advanced knowledge acquisition stage situated between initial creative learning and domain expertise. The article examines the interactive effects of contextual elements in various creative computer-based and AL learning environments while studying English language and addresses learning deficiencies associated with them. It underscores the importance of aligning learning and instruction with contextual factors. The relevance of this research is determined by its exploration of innovative practices, including technology integration, project-based learning, and AI applications in foreign philology. By addressing deficiencies in advanced knowledge acquisition, the research aims to guide philology and other specialists in adapting to 21st-century challenges in education and fostering inclusive creative and impactful learning environments. The scientific novelty of the research consists in its contribution into the educational field by proposing an advanced knowledge acquisition stage. It explores the dynamic interplay of contextual creative elements in computer-based learning, AI and hybrid educational environments while studying English language for special purposes, addressing learning failures and emphasizing the need for alignment with instructional design. This article aims to explore the structure of creative teaching methods and assessment strategies employed into the studying process of Professional English; to investigate and emphasize the critical relevance and scientific novelty of conceptual features in designing effective learning environments. It explores the often-overlooked extended intermediate phase of creative learning and introduces the concept of an advanced knowledge acquisition stage. The research delves into the interactive effects of contextual elements in various computer-based learning environments and identifies learning deficiencies associated with them. Furthermore, the article upholders for the alignment of learning and instruction with contextual factors. The methodology involves a comprehensive literature review on cognitive differences, contextual elements, and recent innovations in education. The ultimate goal is to contribute valuable insights to guide educational institutions in adapting to the 21st-century landscape and fostering inclusive and impactful creative learning environments. The purpose of this article is to investigate and underscore the critical relevance and scientific novelty of creative of using computer-based learning and Artificial intelligence in educational process, partially in studying Professional English, associated with conceptual features in the design of effective creative learning environments. This research aims to bring attention to the often-neglected extended intermediate phase of creative teaching and learning Professional English and introduce the concept of an advanced knowledge acquisition stage. Through an exploration of the interactive effects of contextual elements in various computer-based and AI creative learning environments, the article identify patterns of learning deficiencies. The methodology involves a comprehensive literature review focusing on cognitive differences, contextual elements, and recent innovations in education. Ultimately, the article provides valuable insights that reflects an experience of adapting to the teaching and learning Professional English in the epoch of AI. The methodology involves a comprehensive review of literature on cognitive differences between novice and expert learners, the interplay of contextual elements in learning environments, and recent innovations in education. The research also incorporates an analysis of patterns of deficiency in advanced knowledge acquisition and explores various strategies for incorporating innovations into university education.References
An, D., & Youn, N. (2018). The inspirational power of arts on creativity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 467–475.
Bravo C., Duque R., Gallardo J. (2013) A groupware system to support collaborative programming: Design and experiences. Journal of Systems and Software 86(7):1759–1771.
Brun, J., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2019). Out of the picture? How incompatible knowledge and distant visual stimuli may foster idea generation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(3), 368 - 388. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12311
Burnard, P. Craft A. and Grainger, T. (2006) Possibility Thinking. International Journal Early Years Education, 14(3), 243-262.
Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., Gray, D. S. & Trowsdale, J. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/promoting- educationalresearch/projects/reviewing-the-potential-and-challenges-of-developing-steameducation
Das S. (2022). The Meaning of Creativity Through the Ages: From Inspiration to Artificial Intelligence. Creative business education: exploring the contours of pedagogical praxis. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 27-53.
Esling Ph. David N. (2020) Creativity in the era of artificial intelligence. Journées d’Informatique Musicale, 2020 – Préactes.
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
Gilbo M.B., Heinerichs S., Pazzaglia G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Elsevier. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 109-114.
Kaufman J. C., Sternberg R. J. The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Kirkwood, A., Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, media and technology, 39(1), pp.6-36.
Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Ahmed Abuzaid, R., & Shagholi, R. (2010). Hypothesized Learners' Technology Preferences Based on Learning Style Dimensions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(4), pp. 83-93.
Smith, J. B., Weiss, S. F., & Ferguson, G. J. (1987). A hypertext writing environment and its cognitive basis. In Hypertext '87 papers (pp. 195-214). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Tenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Siemon, D., & Bissantz, S. R. (2018). A creativity support tool for cognitive idea stimulation in entrepreneurial activities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 33(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2018.090345
Siemon, D. (2022). Elaborating Team Roles for Artificial Intelligence-based Teammates in Human-AI Collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(5), 871–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726- 022-09792-z
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vosniadou, S., Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Education Research, 57(1), 51-67.
Voss, J. F. (1987). Learning and transfer in subject-matter learning: A problem-solving model. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 607-622.
Zhu, C. (2012) Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc.15, 127–136. [Google Scholar].