FEATURES OF HUMOROUS TECHNIQUES IN DIPLOMATIC INTERNET COMMUNICATION (THE EXAMPLE OF S. KYSLYTSYA`S X-MESSAGES)
Keywords:
Humour, Twitter-diplomacy, social media, sarcasm, irony, satire, political discourse.Abstract
The article examines the features of humorous techniques in diplomatic internet communication, focusing on the messages of Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Sergiy Kyslytsya, on the social media platform X (Twitter). The aim of the study is to analyse the role of humour in diplomatic discourse through social networks, particularly in the context of its role in political communications during the Russian-Ukrainian war. Special attention is given to types of humorous devices such as sarcasm, irony, and satire, which are used to emphasize hostility towards Russian policies and its representatives in international organizations. The authors explore how humour in the Ukrainian politician's posts serves as a tool for criticism and distancing from political opponents, as well as how it helps create an image of an aggressive regime and its supporters. The article analyses communication methods that include both critical and satirical elements, contributing not only to mockery but also to shaping Ukraine's international image in the context of global politics. The study also focuses on the importance of humour as a strategy that allows diplomats to reduce the traditional distance in official communication while simultaneously lowering the tension in political discussions. The main findings of the study highlight the significance of humour and certain types of comic elements in diplomatic discourse in contemporary politics, particularly in the context of the growing influence of social networks. The paper discusses the prospects for further research, including the study of lexical and semantic characteristics of humour in political texts and the pragmatic aspects of using humour to achieve politicians' communicative goals.References
Chernobrov, D. (2022). Strategic humour: Public diplomacy and comic framing of foreign policy issues. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(2), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211023958
Durkheim, E. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Alcan.
Freud, S. (1905). Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewußten. Leipzig: Deuticke.
Golan, G. J., Manor, I., & Arceneaux, P. (2019). Mediated Public Diplomacy Redefined: Foreign Stakeholder Engagement via Paid, Earned, Shared, and Owned Media. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(12), 1665–1683.
Halversen, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2023). Memeing Politics: Understanding Political Meme Creators, Audiences, and Consequences on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231205588
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Andrew Crooke.
Jones, J. (2016). Politics and the digital humanities. New Media & Society, 18(4), 657-674.
Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin: Lagarde und Friedrich.
Koivukoski, J. (2022). Political Humor in the Hybrid Media Environment: Studies on Journalistic Satire and Amusing Advocacy. 10.13140/RG.2.2.27965.33768.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Dictionary by Merriam-Webster. In Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Raskin, V. (2008). Primer of humor research. Berlin: De Gruyter, Inc.
Schopenhauer, A. (1819). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
Sinkropi, J. (1984). Humor in context: Varieties and forms. In V. Raskin (Ed.), Semantic Mechanisms of Humor (pp. 33-55). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Speier, H. (1975). Wit and Politics: An Essay on Laughter and Power. American Journal of Sociology, 79(6), 1352-1371.
Spencer, H. (1860). The Physiology of Laughter. Macmillan's Magazine, 1, 395-402.
Weitz, E. (2017). Editorial: Humour and social media. European Journal of Humour Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.4.weitz
Yehorova, O. I., Prokopenko, A. V., & Martynenko, S. S. (2022). Wordplay in wartime Twitter communication: A case study of Ukrainian politicians’ humorous tweets. Zakarpats’ki Filolohichni Studii, 24(1), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2022.24.1.18
Yehorova, O., Prokopenko, A., & Zinchenko, A. (2023). Towards a typology of humorous wartime tweets: The case of Ukraine 2022. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.1.746
Денисюк, С. Г. (2011). Гумор як політико-комунікативна технологія. Політологічний вісник, 57, 260–268.
Храбан, Т. Є. (2021). Військовий чорний гумор як форма адаптаційних процесів і реагування індивіда на страх смерті (психолінгвістичний аспект). Вісник університету імені Альфреда Нобеля, 21(1), 243–250.
Шаповал, Ю. (Ред.). (2009). Політична енциклопедія. Либідь. С. 590.