THE CONCEPT OF AGGRESSION IN THE ENGLISH DISCOURSE OF WAR: A COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC DIMENSION
Keywords:
Aggression, frame model, concept, prominence, propositional scheme, semantic network of meaning, war discourse.Abstract
This article focuses on the construction of the meanings of AGGRESSION that are profiled in different domains of the world construal. The purpose of this article is to identify the semantic features of nominations of AGGRESSION in English and to model the concept of AGGRESSION in the English-language discourse of war, in particular, russia's full-scale military aggression against Ukraine. The relevance of the object of study is determined by the importance of the russia-Ukraine war as today’s global threat and is reinforced by the use of a cognitive-semantic and conceptual approaches to its study. The article proposes and proves a hypothesis about the attributive nature of the concept of AGGRESSION, which in the world construal is profiled in the segments of WAR and PEACE and has semantic qualities and conceptual features specific to each of them. The study was conducted in three stages according to the degree of generalization and abstraction of the data. At the first stage, the lexical set of concept nominations was systematized, and the semantic space of AGGRESSION was outlined. At the second stage, the semantic network of concept names profiled in the WAR segment of the world construal was modeled. The most typical ways of schematic generalization of meanings prove to be the object frame and identification frame, while the action frame is limited to the contact action scheme. At the third stage, AGGRESSION was modeled on the basis of the cognitive operation of highlighting / prominence of meanings. The study concludes that in the English-language discourse of war, AGGRESSION is an attributive poly-appealed concept that is profiled in the WAR segment of the world construal and is defined as a contact offensive action initiated by the aggressor, violent, unreasonable and unprovoked, threatening to foreign territory and civilians; it is distinguished by cruelty and bloodshed, it is of terrorist and genocidal nature.References
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
CACD – Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary (n.d.). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/
САLDT – Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus (n.d.). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/
Campbell, A., Muncer, S., & Gorman, B. (1993). Sex and social representations of aggression: A communal-agentic analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 19(2), 125–135.
De Paolo, Ch. (2003). Human Prehistory in Fiction. Jefferson, NC, and London: McFarland Inc.
Dinstein, Y. (2017). War, Aggression and Self-Defence. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Encyclopædia Britannica (n.d.). Aggression. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/aggression
Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222-254.
Hasekiu, F. (2013). Learning of bullying’s acts throught social learning. Journal of
Educational and Social Research, 3(7), 131. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n7p131
Huesmann, L. R., & Skoric, M. M. (Eds.). (2003). Regulating media violence: Why, how and by whom? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karlsen, I.L., Kristiansen, J., Østergaard Jaspers, S., Rasmussen, Lene., Laursen, L.L., Bengtsen, E., & Aust, B. (2023). Reduction of aggressive behavior and effects on improved wellbeing of health care workers and people with dementia: A review of reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 71, 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2023.101843
Krysanova, T., & Herezhun, O. (2023). Mulˊtymodalne smyslotvorennia ahresii v anhlomovnomu pisennomu naratyvi: Kohnityvno-prahmatychnyi aspekt [Multimodal meaning-making of aggression in English song narrative: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective]. Cognition, communication, discourse, 26, 83-108; http://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2023-26-05
Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
MWDT – Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Thesaurus (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Moseley, A., (2002). A Philosophy of War. New York, NY: Algora Publishing.
Rondini, C. A., & Almeida, A. (2022). Bullying and giftedness in school environment. Gifted and Talented International, 37(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2021.1978351
Sampasa, H., & Hamilton, H. A. (2015). Use of social networking sites and risk of
cyberbullying victimization: A population-level study of adolescents.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18, 704–710. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0145
Shevchenko, I. (2017). Had We Never Loved So Kindly: Conceptualisation of communicative behavior. In E. Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, & O. Vorobyova (Eds.), Language – Literature – the Arts: A Cognitive-Semiotic Interface. Series: Text – meaning – context: Cracow Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture (pp. 307-320). Frankfurt-am-Mein: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b10692
Shevchenko, I. (2022). American social media on the Russia-Ukraine war: A multimodal analysis. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-05
Shevchenko, I.S., Morozova, I.I., & Shevchenko, V.O. (2022). Nominatsii ahresii rosii proty Ukrainy v anhlomovnykh media: kohnityvno-prahmatychnyi analiz [Nominations of Russian aggression against Ukraine in English-language media: а cognitive-pragmatic study]. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching, 95, 70-77. https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-8877-2022-95-09
The NYT – The New York Times (2023-2024). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/
Yavorska, H. (2024). Dyskurs viiny (kilka metodolohichnykh pytan) [Discourse of war (some methodological issues]. In B. Azhniuk (Ed.), Mova i viina: dynamika movnoi systemy i movna polityka (рр. 211-228). Кyiv: D. Burago Publishing House.
Zhabotynska, S. (2013). Imia kak tekst: kontseptualnaia set’ leksycheskoho znachenyia (analiz imeni emotsii). The name as a text: conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion). [The name as a text: conceptual network of lexical meaning (analysis of the name of emotion)]. Cognition, communication, discourse, 6, 47-76. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2013-06-04
Zhabotynska, S., & Brynko, A. (2022). Emotive lexicon of the political narrative: Ukraine and the West in Chinese media. Cognition, communication, discourse, 25, 89-118. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-07
