Shchyhlo L. Fractal Self-organization of the German Word-formation System

  • Nonlinearity – the main term of synergetics, which allows the researcher to notify instability, diversity, non-equilibrium, the interaction of the plurality of processes within a single system. The basis for the determination of chaos in the language is fractals as the boundaries of objects having the properties of scale invariance, that is, there is a constant change of objects, but necessarily within a certain integrity of this phenomenon. Fractality is considered by us as a recursive-iterative process, which results in the generation of self-similar nonlinear structures, that is, fractals, which are crafted by a number of properties such as: dynamism, nonlinearity, self-similarity, recursiveness, fineness, and ability to self-development.
    The article is devoted to the coverage of the German word-formation system as an open, dynamic, non-linear, non-equilibrium macrosystem, structured according to the fractal principle, where each of its fragments contains the «imprint of the whole». It has been discovered that the openness of word-forming microsystems leads to their potential for degeneration into more complex structures – word-formation nests, which relate to complex non-equilibrium, nonlinear fractals. The word-formation nest is distinguished in comparison with the word-formation chain, the hierarchy of its structural organization, the greater degree of openness and nonequilibrium, the variety of attractors that the system may derive from the micro-level entropy. It is proved that word-fractality as dynamic multiscale recurrence is based on the isomorphism of semantic-word-formation connections, is a method of «gripping» the micro-systems of word-formation into a single whole and a guarantee of the internal integrity of the word-formation macrosystem, the coherent interaction of its constituent components, which provides it with viability, dynamism and full-fledged functioning.
  • word-formation system, linguasynergetics, nonlinearity, fractality, German language.
    1. Belozerova N. N. Mozhno li poverit’ diskurs fraktalom? URL: http: // frgf.utmn.ru/last/No16/text01.htm (data obrawenija : 18.02. 2019).
    2. Bogatyh B. A. Fraktal’naja priroda postneklassicheskogo poznanija. Filosofskie nauki. 2007. № 6. S. 27–40.
    3. Bronnik L. V. O fraktal’nom samopodobii v jazyke. Izvestija Volgogralskogo gosud. ped. un-ta. Ser. Filologicheskie nauki. 2009. № 10 (44). S. 15–19.
    4. Bronnik L. V. Jazykovaja dinamika v diskurse: kognitivno-sinergeticheskij podhod: avtoref. dis. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni d-ra filol. nauk : spec. 10.02.19 «Teorija jazyka». Moskva, 2012. 42 s.
    5. Vikipedija. URL : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (data obrawenija: 26. 02. 2019).
    6. Vojcehovich V. E. Fraktal’naja kartina mira kak osnovanie teorii slozhnosti. URL : http://www.inauka.ru/blogs/article62789/print.html (data obrawenija: 2. 02. 2019).
    7. Gijom G. Principy teoreticheskoj lingvistiki: sbornik neizdannyh tekstov, podgotovlenyj pod rukovodstvom i s predisloviem Roka Valena: per. s fr. Moskva, 2010. 232 s.
    8. Danilov J. A., Kadomcev B. B. Chto takoe sinergetika?. URL : http://www.kirsoft.com.ru/freedom/KSNews_227.htm (data obrawenija: 25.02.2019).
    9. Dombrovan T. I. Sinergeticheskaja model’ razvitija anglijskogo jazyka: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.04. Odessa, 2013. 466 s.
    10. Enikeeva S. M. Fraktal’nost’ mikrosistem slovoobrazovanija (na materiale anglijskogo jazyka). Studia Linguistica. Jazyk v logike vremeni: Nasledie, tradicii, perspektivy.  Sankt-Peterburg, 2011.  S. 107–118.
    11. Enіkeeva S. M. Sistema slovotvoru suchasnoi anglіjs’koi movy: sinergetichnij aspekt (na materіalі novoutvoren’ kіncja XX – pochatku XXІ stolіt’) : avtoref. dis. na zdobuttja nauk. stupenja d-ra fіlol. nauk: spec. 10.02.04 «Germans’kі movi». Kyiv, 2011. 36 s.
    12. Zhukov D. S., Ljamin, S. K. Metafory fraktalov v obwestvenno-politicheskom znanii. Tambov, 2007. 136 s.
    13. Knjazeva E. N., Kurdjumov S. P. Osnovanija sinergetiki: Sinergeticheskoe mirovidenie. Moskva, 2010. 256 s. (Serija «Sinergetika: ot proshlogo k buduwemu»).
    14. Knjazeva E. N., Kurdjumov S. P. Sinergetika: Nelinejnost’ vremeni i landshafty kojevoljucii. M.: KomKniga, 2011. 272 s. (Serija «Sinergetika: ot proshlogo k buduwemu».)
    15. Klimenko N. F., Karpilovs’ka Є. A. Slovotvirna morfemika suchasnoi ukrains’koi movy. Kyiv, 1998. 161 s.
    16. Kretov A. A. Fraktal’nost’ v russkom jazyke. URL : http://tipl-vrn.ru/publication (data obrawenija: 11.02.2019).
    17. Mandel’brot B. Fraktal’naja geometrija prirody. Moskva, 2002. 656 s.
    18. Tarasenko V. V. Fraktal’naja semiotika: «slepye pjatna», peripetii i uznavanija. Moskva, 2009. 232 s.
    19. Tacenko N. V. Realіzacіja empatіi v suchasnomu anglomovnomu dyskursі: kognіtyvno-synergetychnyj aspekt. Sumy, 2017. 357 s.
    20. Jurgens H., Pajtgen H-O., Zaupe D. Jazyk fraktalov. URL : http://www.ega-math.narod.ru/Nquant/ Fractals.htm (data obrawenija: 12.01.2019).
    21. Berladir K.V., Hovorun T.P., Bilous O. A., Baranova S. V. The modeling of the composition and properties of functional materials based on polytetrafluoroethylene  // Functional Materials.  2018. Vol. 25, № 2. P. 342– 347.  DOI: 10.15407/fm25.02.342.
    22. Peitgen H.-O., Richter P. H. The Beauty of Fractals. Images of Complex Dynamical Systems. XVI. Berlin, 1992. 984 p.

     

     

  • Download full version