Kobyakova, I. Communicative Behavior: Gender Aspect

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/Ftrk.2018.10(3)-08

  • The subject matter of the article is being worded in the very title of it. The article in question focuses upon the communicative behavior of men and women in the similar situations. The gender categories are considered in the terms of emotionality and verbal behavior. The objectives, methods, aims, scholars reviews are noted herein. Emphasized are the ideas of dominant ideas of differences between male and female in communicative behavior. Language modus is of the common information of ethnic groups. The gender differences do not eliminate the right to the words and their functions. Men and women speak one language, they make one team and go together but apart. The aim of the article is to study the communication behavior (gender aspect). The peculiarities of the children upbringing follow the social traditions. Great attention is being paid to the lexicon of the people’s behavior and emotionality into that. The conclusion arrived at the article is that cardinal differences work by complex biological, social, emotional behavior and psychological factors. Nowadays gender studies play the significant role in the humane and inhumane disciplines.
  • communicative behavior, men and female, gender aspects, emotionality, information, verbal behavior, linguo-cognitive approach.
    1. Kobyakova, I.K., Gema, A.V. (2007). Lingvocommunicative aspects of gender constructs (in English phraseological units). SSU Visnyk. Series of Philology.№2, 133-138. – URL: http://tractatus.sumdu.edu.ua/Arhiv/2007-1/25.pdf
    2. Goroshko, O. I. (2006). Henderno markovana leksika [Gender marked vocabulary]. Uchenyye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsionalnogo universiteta im. V. Vernadskogo, 19(2), 99–102. .
    3. Burukyna, O. (2000). Gender aspect of translation. Gender as an intrigue of cognition: (99 – 107). Sat. Art. – M.: Rudomino.
    4. Horoshko, E.I. (2001). Gender issues in linguistics. [Introduction to gender studies: in 2 parts: Proc. Essay). In Zherebkina (Ed.). (pp. 508–542). Kharkiv: Aleteyya.
    5. Oppermann, K., Weber, E. (1995). Frauensprache Mannersprache. [Die verschiedenen Kommunikationsstile von Mannern und Frauen]. Zurich: Orell Fussli.
    6. Linke, A. (1996). Studienbuch Linguistik. Tybingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    7. Peyer, A., Groth, R. (1995). Sprache und Geschlecht [Studienbibliographie Sprachwissenschaft]. Heidelberg: Groos.
    8. Weigel, S. (1986). Das Weibliche als Metapher ‚des Metonymischen: Kritische Uberlegungen zur Konstitution des Weiblichen als Verfahren oder Schreibweise. Frauensprache – Frauenliteratur. Filr und Wider einer Psychoanalyse literarischer Werke. In Inge Stephan, Carl Pietzcker (Ed.). (pp. 56–74). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
    9. Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don`t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation.
    10. Tannen, D. (1996). Gender and Discourse. Oxford University – 234p.
    11. NTC’s American Idioms Dictionary by Richard A. Spears. – Jersey City, NJ USA. – 389
    12. Bidenko, L., Ganna Bespalova, G. (2017). Implementing Audio-Lingual Method to Teaching Ukrainian as A Foreign Language at The Initial Stage Advanced Education. 2017, Issue 7, (pp. 23-27). DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.82711.
    13. Spender, D (1980). Man Made Language. – London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    14. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. – New York: Harper & Row.
  • Download full version