UDC: A NEW DISENFRANCHISED TYPE OF PERSON IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN SMALL PROSE OF THE LITERARY EMIGRATION OF 1919–1939

This article deals with the evolution of a disenfranchised type of person in the works of small prose of Ukrainian and Russian emigration writers in the period between 1919 and 1939. In the stories by V. Leontovych and V. Fedorov the type of disenfranchised person is presented and formed under the conditions of the Bolshevik Regime. Thus, the characters of the works find themselves in situations of alienation or conflict with the Bolshevik authorities: among these we encounter Sarah Solomonivna, a professor, the nationalist Kost, Olexander Levenets (stories by V. Leontovych «Sarah Solomonivna», «Hynut Mriyi», «Vyhnantsi»), and the peasant Varenyk (stories by V. Fedorov «Sud Varenyka»). These disenfranchised individuals have no place in the new society. The stories show how these individuals perceive hostility of the new order, the last one catching them all up gradually, and how each of these characters is being subjected to tests and trials by the new government. The attitude towards the protagonists from their neighbours and colleagues changes, giving place to arising suspicion and distrust. The main characteristics of the new type of disenfranchised person of the 20–40s are alienation from both the politics of the new government and from the native environment, accompanied by a deep mental fatigue caused by the painful loss of the motherland, the last one developing into existential loneliness.

any work researching the issues described above in either Ukrainian or Russian literature, which is where the relevance of the present work lies.
The purpose of the present work is to reveal and underline the typical characteristics of a «superfluous» person in Ukrainian and Russian emigration literature of  on the examples of works by Volodymyr Leontovych and Vasyl Fedorov. Results of the research. When speaking about the literature of the twenty-year interwar period of the 20th century, we would have to put "superfluous people" into the quotation marks, given this artistic type arose and is too distant from the environment when compared to the last century. However, we still use this term since it is the closest to the literary type of the mentioned characters, who were against Bolshevik Regime and felt alien to the new government.
The main character of V. Fedorov's story «Sud Varenyka» is a typical Ukrainian. His house stands alone, on the Dnipro's bank. With the arrival of Bolsheviks, the life of the hero was neatly divided into two partsthe one before their arrival and another one afterwards. Before the Bolsheviks came to power, Varenyk was a hard-working farmer, but became a kulak afterwards, after the incident with a commission consisting exclusively out of Slobodyan people: «they discovered the last bag of flour in the canopies with hardworking zeal which could have been compared to that of mice» («струдолюбивым рвением мышей откопала в сенцах последний мешок муки») [9, p. 183]. The author compares Varenyk to Diogenes, since he would sit on a barrel near the shore, and his appearance reminds of the ancient philosopher: «His bare feet would hang down the same way as those of Diogenes, and even his gray eyebrows reminded of Diogenes» («Подиогеновски свисали вниз его босые ноги, и седые брови лохматились подиогеновски») [9, p. 181].
Varenyk could not get rid of various obsessive thoughts («strange thoughts»). Throughout the story V. Fedorov emphasizes that everything «seemed ridiculous to him»: why have they taken «his own property: a bag of flour earned by the callosities of his hands...», why the owners even took away rotten potatoes, and why it had to be the former barchuk from among the students expelled high school. The hero is even afraid to die the new way, without a bishop. The present life for Varenyk is similar to a soldier's mess, where everything is mixed in one -«and the dirt, and all the dirty tricks». The hero perceives his uselessness: «...Imagine, now I feel as if I were superfluous... And what is with their lives?» Another time the author includes these thoughts in an internal monologue, in which the character tries to understand whether he is a «superfluous person» at present...» («…Пущай я теперь вроде как лишний… А им что за жизнь?». Іншим разом автор включаєці думки у внутрішній монолог, де герой намагаєтьсязрозуміти, чи й справді «лишний он человек по нынешним временам…») [9, p. 187, 191].

«Філологічні трактати», Том 12, № 1 ' 2020
Varenyk even turned out to be an unwanted guest in his own daughter's house as he came to congratulate her on the birth of Marx, his grandson, though the ungodly name depressed him altogether. Not only the behavior, but also the face of his daughter seems to him «alien and over-painted». For him, the passers-by of Dniepropetrovsk are «…people [who are] superfluous and unfamiliar to him», the guests at christening parties are «parasites» in his eyes, and the glance of the son-in-law is unbearable for Varenyk», «he face he came to hate, as the face of the devil» («лицо, ненавистное ему, как лицо дьявола») [9, p. 194-201].
The heroes of the works by V. Leontovych seem to be disenfranchised, too: the commissioner Sarah Solomonivna from the story with the same title, and the 65-year-old professor, nationalist from the old generation Kost («Hynut Mrii») and the county marshal (the leader of the nobility in pre-revolutionary Russia), Olexander Levenets («Vyhnantsi»). The hostility of the new system catches up with all of them gradually, and each of the characters gets tested by the new government. One observes the changing attitude on the part of neighbors and colleagues, as suspicion and distrust arise.
Internal monologues consisting of numerous rhetorical questions make up a significant part in the works. Difficult obsessive thoughts torment the protagonist of the story «Hynut Mrii»: «Where am I going? What will happen? What will I do? Is everything that takes place now, the only sense of the whole life, and is it at all human, all that is being done currently? . Also the life of Sarah Solomonivna becomes difficult with the communists' appearance. The same way as Aaron Nusimovych, Sarah does not want to adapt to changes, but desires to eat her bread, her meals, in an honest way: «I earned it, therefore it is mine, and if it is mine, then no damn person can take it away from me, and if they give it to you today for being a communistit means today they want communists and therefore give it,but if tomorrow they will change their mind, they would even take away what they have given you today… In that case I don't want it…» («Заробила, так моє, а як моє, так щоб ніякий чорт забирати його в мене не важився, а як дають за те, що ти сьогодні комуністий, сьогодні схотять -дадуть, завтра не схотять -і те, що дали, заберуть… то хай воно сказиться…») [3, p. 310]. Feeling herself superfluous, as if her life were of no meaning or would make no difference, the woman finds courage to flee abroad to her daughters by using tricks to obtain permission to leave the Ukraine. She is sad to leave Kyiv, dismal to remember the past. But two years later, when she finds out about hunger and fear in the Ukraine, and the situation was getting worse and worse, she thought, «I am not happy here, but still, thank God, I'm not there» («Тут мені зле, та дякувати Богові, що таки я не там») [3, p. 314].
Levenets turned out to be a disenfranchised citizen, too. His life changed drastically after the arrival of the Bolsheviks. He was respected by all, rich and poor. Since the marshal had worked in various public services for twenty-five years, he was certain to have «deserved the respect of people», which proves the autobiographical basis of the author's work who obtained a law degree and was engaged in agricultural and cultural activities before the revolution and participated in the work of local self-government. Moreover, he was a magistrate and influenced decisions of economic provincial regions by solving various issues of Poltava region for about a quarter of a century [8, p. 35-37].
The hero of the story by V. Leontovich gradually finds himself alienated. During their second invasion, the Bolsheviks arrested Levents, and villagers from the nearby villages came to ask for him and, thus, he was released. But the hatred towards the new government, which burned, plundered, killed, and abused of people, kept growing inside him with every day. Levenets was struck by grief, very similar to Varenyk from the story by Fedorov. He saw that the new government «had no sense and was wild». Olexander Ivanovych was seized by horror which «troubled his soul, darkened his thoughts» («жах скаламучував душу, тьмарив думки») [3, p. 294]. Besides, he was disturbed by lynching of the community over the peasants who denounced the Bolsheviks. Prokip Hryhorovych tried to explain everything («Do we really have to endure it, lower our heads till our hands will be tied? This is how we save the best we can: <...> we destroy our own communists» («Невже ж нам оцю напасть так і терпіти, невже хилити голову, поки скрутять? Ось і рятуємо, як уміємо: <…> наших комуністів і нищимо») [3, p. 298]), but sad thoughts and despair did not abandon Levents.
Varenyk reminds of «the last of the Mohicans» as he arranged a lynching for his son-inlaw who had a strong desire to serve the Soviet power with all his might. As he could not endure further tortures, he tricked Stephan into the barn, with a promise to rewrite his property on his name, and said pulling the trigger: «I sentence you to death» («К расстрелу я тебя присудил») [9, p. 205].
The characters of the works by Leontovych and Fedorov are the personification of the spirit of their time. The opinion on behalf of the disenfranchised person of the Bolshevik era is expressed by the professor of Leontovych's story «Hynut Mrii»: «What is the future of such people? How can one live on with an empty heart, without love, love no one, live without faith and without a hope!..» («Яка будуччина такого народу? Як можна жити далі з порожнім серцем, без любови, бо любити нікого, без віри й надії!..») [3, p. 205].
Conclusions. Thus, in the emigration literature there is a type of a new «superfluent» person formed under the conditions of Bolshevism. Such a person presents the following inherent characteristics: alienation from both, politics of the new government as well as from his native environment, a feeling of deep mental fatigue from the loss of his homeland, which develops into existential loneliness. The «superfluent» people in the Ukrainian and Russian literature of the interwar period are the best, the brightest people of their time, who are suffering and are rooting for the fate of the state. They are usually alien to everyone: villagers who do not understand and denounce them to the Bolshevik authorities, frequently they are not even needed by their families. They especially feel alienated from a new power which uses inhumane methods on them. Usually, the new «superfluent» person cannot or does not want to be tested by the Bolshevik authorities, which he/she hates, therefore the individual chooses one of the following ways: or emigration / armed struggle, as in the works of small prose by V. Leontovych and V. Fedorov analyzed, or suicide as in «Beetle» by Teffi, «Black Swans» by G. Hazdanov, and others works still awaiting research.