Kats Y., Fadieieva Y. Irony and Means of its Realization in English Literary Discourse (Translation Aspect)

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21272/ftrk.2018.10(1)-05

  • The notion of “irony” exists in various historical-philosophical and linguistic contexts (from Socrates, Aristotle and to Postmodernism). Each era brought its nuances in its content, but in none of the categories of categories it could not claim a leading role. Therefore, the prospects for its development and study remain open.
    In modern linguistics, irony is considered as a style-building feature of the text, which can be implemented at different language levels, from one word, to a holistic text in a mandatory contextual environment. The great significance of the context for decoding irony is due to its intellectualism and, consequently, the growth of its weight in contemporary art, the expansion of the means and mechanisms for its implementation in artistic texts.
    In this context, the analysis of linguistic means of irony in the English artistic discourse becomes significant and relevant.
  • irony, stylistic device, expressive means, non-conformity, situational irony, associative irony, negation, lexical level, syntactical level, transformations.
    1. Kalyta, O. M. (2004). Іronіya yak subkategorіya komіchnogo [Irony as a subcategory of comic]. Naukovyi chasopis. Series 8 (Philology), 1, 67‑71. Kyiv, Ukraine: NPU im. M. P. Drahomanova.
    2. Kam”yanets’, A. B. (2009). Vіdtvorennya іntertekstual’noi іronіi v anhlo-ukrains’komu hudozhniomu perekladі [Reproduction of intertextual irony in the English-Ukrainian artistic translation]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv, Ukraine.
    3. Dzemidok, B. (1997). Pro komizm [About Comic]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Nauk. dumka.
    4. Vorontsova, N. H. (2005). Komunіkatyvno-kohnіtyvnі osoblyvostі verbal’noi іnterakcіi zі storonnіm retsipіyentom (na materіalі anhlіys’koi movy) [Communicative-cognitive features of verbal interaction with a third-party recipient (on the material of the English language)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Lviv National University I. Franka, L’viv, Ukraine.
    5. Lesyk, V. (2011). Efekt kontrastu yak vyjav paradoksal’nostі іronіi [The effect of contrast as a paradoxical expression of irony]. Studia Germanica et Romanica: Foreign languages. World Literature. Teaching methods, 8(1), 41‑52;  Bibliogr,  pp. 51‑52.
    6. Voloshchuk, I. (2006). Viznachennya іronії v hudozhn’omu tekstі ta diskursі [Definition of irony in artistic text and discourse]. Naukovi zapysky (pp. 42‑44), Nizhyn. derzh. ped. un-t im. M. Hoholya, Nizhyn, Ukraine
    7. Bekhta, A. (2010). Opovіdnyi diskurs v anhlomovnіi hudozhnіi prozі: tipolohіya ta dynamyka movlennevyh form [Relevant Discourse in English Prose: Typology and Dynamics of Speech Forms]. Extended abstract of PhD thesis. Kyiv, Ukraine.
    8. Prykhod’ko, H. I. (2001). Osoblyvostі realіzatsіi sarkazmu ta іronіi v hudozhniomu tekstі [Features of the realization of sarcasm and irony in the artistic text]. In D. S. Buraho (Ed.), Mova I Kul’tura, Iss. 3, Vol. 4: Mova I khudozhnia tvorchist (pp. 207-210). Kyiv, Ukraine.
    9. Salihova, N. K. (1976). YAzykovaya priroda i funktsional’naya kharakteristika stilisticheskogo priyoma ironii [Linguistic nature and functional characteristic of stylistic reception of irony]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Moscow, Russia.
    10. Harris, Z. (1952). Discourse Analysis. Language, 28(17), 1‑30. https://doi.org/10.2307/409987
    11. Halliday, M. A. K. &.Hasan, R. (1991). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University
    12. Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1996). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University
    13. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3, 192‑217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
    14. Weisgerber, J. (1973). Satire and irony as means of communication. Comparative literature studies,10(2), 157‑172.
    15. Ostman, J. & Virtanen, T. (1995). Discourse analysis. Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 239‑253). Amsterdam, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.dis1
    16. Pochodnia, S. I. (1989). YAzykovyie vidy i sredstva realizatsii ironii [Language Types and Means of Realizing Irony]. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.
  • Download full version